diff --git a/Residential-Proxies-and-Local-CAPTCHA-Solving.md b/Residential-Proxies-and-Local-CAPTCHA-Solving.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3f9b200
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Residential-Proxies-and-Local-CAPTCHA-Solving.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+A Selenium setup is a go-to for browser automation, and CapSkip drops right in. Your your driver flow unchanged and hand off the challenge to CapSkip whenever one appears, so the run continues without human input.
+
+Headless browsers expose signals that anti-bot systems watch for, which is why pairing solid browser setup with reliable CAPTCHA solving matters. CapSkip handles the solving half while your team concentrate on the browser side.
+
+Fundamentally, a CAPTCHA solver reads a challenge and produces the answer a site is looking for, so an hands-off script can continue. What sets CapSkip apart is everything happens on your own Windows machine - no challenge data is shipped off to a stranger, and there are no per-CAPTCHA fees. This mix of privacy and flat pricing turns out to be hard to beat for serious automation.
+
+At its core, a CAPTCHA solver interprets a challenge and produces the solution a site expects, so an automated script can keep going. The difference with CapSkip is everything happens on your own Windows machine - no challenge data leaves your hardware, and you avoid per-solve fees. This mix of privacy and predictable cost is hard to beat for serious automation.
+
+At its core, a CAPTCHA solver interprets a challenge and produces the answer a site is looking for, so an automated tool can continue. The difference with CapSkip is that the work stays on your own Windows machine - nothing is shipped off to a stranger, and there are no per-CAPTCHA fees. This mix of privacy and predictable cost turns out to be a real advantage for serious workloads.
+
+Teams migrating from 2Captcha usually expect a painful migration. In reality, because CapSkip emulates the same request format, the move is largely a matter of endpoints and keeping everything else the same.
+
+Used responsibly, [captcha solving Software](https://studom.at/williankemper) solving powers legitimate work like QA, monitoring, and authorized scraping. It is worth respecting each target's terms and applicable rules; used that way, a solver is simply a productivity tool.
+
+One frequent mistake is simply treating any solver as if interchangeable. Match the tool to the CAPTCHA mix, your volume, and your cost ceiling - CapSkip spans the common types at one price, which suits most real projects.
+
+Proxies is essential for real scraping, and CapSkip works with them without fuss. You can route traffic however your stack requires while still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, which keeps behavior natural across sessions.
+
+The v3 flavor works differently: instead of a clickable challenge, it rates interactions silently. Getting a usable token takes a solver that understands the way v3 works, and CapSkip is built to handle it, producing tokens quickly so your pipeline continues.
+
+Google reCAPTCHA v2 is among the most widespread challenges on the web, covering the classic checkbox to invisible and callback variants. CapSkip handles each of these locally quickly, so your scraper will not stall whenever one shows up. Since it emulates common solver APIs, hooking it up is straightforward.
+
+Proxy support is often necessary for serious scraping, and CapSkip plays nicely with them out of the box. You can route requests the way your setup requires while still solving CAPTCHAs on your own machine, so the footprint consistent across runs.
+
+A major benefits of running locally is price. Most services charge for each solve, so your costs rise the moment throughput grows. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so scaling without worrying about the meter.
+
+Image CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, from sign-up pages to registration screens. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA types locally, typically almost instantly. That kind of speed adds up when you process large numbers of challenges.
+
+Within reason, CAPTCHA solving supports legitimate work such as testing, monitoring, and authorized scraping. Always wise honoring a target's terms and applicable rules; used that way, a good solver is another automation helper.
+
+Moving from CapSolver is just as painless: point your tooling at CapSkip, keep your flow, and trade per-solve billing for one predictable price. Any migration is usually done in minutes, rather than days.
+
+A short switch-over checklist makes the switch smooth: point your API URL at CapSkip, verify a few live solves, and then cut over production. Since the API mirrors popular services,  [Click Here](https://wiki-babylonsignalis.org/index.php/User:MichelMcWhae) most of the work is essentially done.
+
+Language coverage means CapSkip handle CAPTCHAs across a wide range of languages, which matters the moment the sites span international. That coverage keeps solve rates steady no matter where the target is.
+
+The v3 flavor takes a different tack: rather than a clickable challenge, it rates behavior silently. Getting a usable token takes a solver that handles how v3 behaves, and CapSkip is built to handle it, returning results quickly so your flow keeps moving.
+
+One of the biggest advantages of processing locally is price. Most services charge for each solve, so your bill rise as throughput increases. CapSkip uses flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so you can scale does not mean worrying about the meter.
\ No newline at end of file